Product
Product

AI Conversation

AI Coaching And Enablement

Reports and Guides

When to power dial and when to parallel dial

alt
Adam Sockel
alt

The recently published State of Cold Calling answers three main questions:

  • What personas seniorities answer the phone most often
  • What personas and seniorities have conversations most often
  • When to call every type of prospect

The report frames big patterns by persona, seniority, and dialing mode. This follow-up playbook delves deeper into understanding why you should power dial and when you should parallel dial.

Download the State of Cold Calling report

Executive summary

  1. Parallel wins in meetings per hour across every seniority overall.Weighted by activity, meetings per hour were higher for the C-suite, VP, Director, Manager, and IC roles. Example, ICs: 0.88 meetings per hour in Parallel vs. 0.62 in Power. Managers: 0.69 vs. 0.53.
  2. Power wins in per-dial quality and depth.Power showed a higher weighted connection rate for every seniority level and a significantly higher meetings-per-connection rate overall (approximately 6.4 percent in Power vs. 3.8 percent in Parallel), with longer average talk time per conversation.
  3. Persona matters more than seniority for mode choice.Finance, Customer Success, and Sales personas lean Parallel for throughput. IT and Legal lean Power for depth and conversion on fewer, higher-intent connects.
  4. Hot Numbers change the calculus.When you switch to numbers with proven connect history, leverage Power to convert at a higher rate and to use the extra talk time. Keep Parallel to surface those signals fast on colder lists.
  5. Blend by stage. Use Parallel to flood the top of the funnel and identify interest. Switch to Power for follow-ups, multi-threading, and executive outreach where precision and depth matter.

Persona playbooks: Where Power wins vs. where Parallel wins

Power first: fewer but deeper conversations that convert

Top segments where Power drove more meetings per hour than Parallel:

PersonaSeniorityMeeting/Hr ParallelMeetings/Hr Power
AdminVP0.1520.280
IT IC0.6780.768
EngineeringDirector0.4300.517
ITManager0.5190.592
AdminC-Suite0.3220.394
LegalVP0.1980.242
ITDirector0.3760.417
MarketingC-Suite0.2620.296

Patterns you can bank on:

  • IT and Legal leadership respond better to Power. Higher per-dial quality plus longer talk time per conversation make Power the better use of executive minutes.
  • Admin VP and C-suite benefit from Power when you already have a reason to call. You trade raw volume for precision and better meeting conversion from each connect.
  • Engineering Directors also skew toward Power. Conversations here are more technical and benefit from prep and presence.

Parallel first: maximize meetings per hour and surface interest quickly

Top segments where Parallel drove more meetings per hour than Power:

PersonaSenioritymeetings/hr Parallelmeetings/hr Power
FinanceIC1.4530.783
Customer SuccessManager0.9240.425
FinanceC-Suite1.0030.530
Executive LeadershipIC1.1970.799
FinanceManager0.8110.435
Human ResourcesIC0.5930.242
FinanceDirector0.6960.349
FInanceVP0.8140.481

Patterns you can bank on:

  • Finance across all seniorities shows parallel dialing success for sheer meeting throughput. Even though Power’s connect rate can be slightly higher, Parallel’s 2.5x dial velocity dominates the outcome.
  • Customer Success Managers and Directors also lean heavily towards Parallel. There are many reachable ICs and managers, and Parallel gets you to them faster.
  • Sales VPs are a notable Parallel win for meetings per hour, even when Power’s per-dial connect rate is close. Parallel’s volume creates more total at-bats.

Quality vs. quantity: what the talk-time and conversion tell us

  • Meetings per connect is higher in Power. Across the dataset, Power converts connects to meetings at about 6.4 percent, Parallel at about 3.8 percent.
  • Average bridged talk time per conversation is consistently longer in Power. For example, Admin conversations averaged roughly 9 to 11 minutes bridged talk in Power vs. about 4 to 5 minutes in Parallel. That extra time is where discovery happens and multi-threading starts.

Read this as a trade-off. If your list is cold, large, and mixed, start with Parallel to find signal. As the signals warm up, switch to Power to deepen and convert.

Time-of-day nuance you can use

Looking at meetings per dial hour by hour:

  • Finance early mornings stand out. Parallel spikes occur as the workday begins (8-10am local time), often with 2 to 3 meetings per hour of Power in those windows.
  • IT Managers early can favor Parallel when you call before calendars fill, but leadership in IT still trends Power due to better per-connect conversion.
  • Executive ICs show a Parallel advantage early in the day for speed and coverage, then even out later when Power’s deeper conversations help convert follow-ups.

Utilize your team’s call blocks to capitalize on these windows: Parallel in the early surfacing hours, then Power as callbacks and second touches increase.

Hot Numbers

Hot and Cold Numbers: How List Quality Shifts Mode Choice

  • Hot numbers had significantly higher connect rates across every persona in the published report and, as expected, exhibit the same pattern here in the raw data. Reps should be power dialing all hot numbers, especially for executive titles where you want longer, higher-quality conversations.
  • Cold numbers need volume. Run Parallel to identify pockets of responsiveness, then route those records into Power call block lists for conversion if and when they are picked.

A simple decision framework

  1. Start with your goal
    • Net new coverage on a big, cold list: Parallel
    • Executive conversion and follow-ups: Power
  2. Check persona and seniority
    • IT and Legal leadership, Admin VP, Engineering Director: Power first
    • Finance, Customer Success, Sales, Operations across ICs and Managers: Parallel first
  3. Consider time of day
    • Early windows for Finance and Executive IC: Parallel
    • Afternoon follow-ups or scheduled callbacks: Power
  4. Escalate by signal
    • First connect or repeat pickup on an account: migrate that record to a Power call blitz.
    • No signal after multiple Parallel passes at good times: Consider adjusting to an email or social sequence until a touchpoint is successful. Then call.
  5. Coach to the mode
    • Parallel blocks: crisp openers, fast disqualification, strong voicemail disciplinePower blocks: pre-call notes, multi-thread targets in CRM, outcome-driven talk tracks

What to operationalize first

Block design

  • Mornings: Parallel on Finance, Sales, Customer Success.
  • Midday: Parallel on ICs and Managers across go-to-market personas.
  • Afternoons: Power on IT, Legal, Admin VP, Engineering Director.
  • Late day: reserve for Power follow-ups and scheduled calls.

List routing

  • Cold numbers should be Parallel dialed. Any Hot Numbers should be pushed to a Power queue and called first.

Analytics to track

  • Track per rep and per team: meetings per dial hour by mode, meetings per connect by mode, and talk time per conversation. The right mix will differ by territory. Your north star is total meetings per rep hour without losing conversation quality.

Parallel dialing creates the meetings. Power secures the buy-in. Use Parallel to identify the individuals who are ready to discuss. Use Power to make those conversations count.

This dataset shows that teams that blend the two by persona, seniority, time of day, and list temperature win the most hours, the most meetings, and the highest-quality pipeline.

Share